I’ve audited chargeback data for e-commerce teams who assumed their dispute rates were a logistics problem. In most cases, over half the chargebacks came from verified customers who received their orders. That’s friendly fraud, and it costs merchants more than stolen card fraud in most verticals.

This post covers what friendly fraud is, how it differs from chargeback fraud, what the consequences look like in practice, and which prevention methods actually recover revenue.

What Is Friendly Fraud?

Friendly fraud happens when a cardholder completes a legitimate purchase, receives the goods or service, and then disputes the charge with their issuing bank. Common reasons filed include “item not received,” “unrecognized charge,” or “not as described.”

A 2024 Chargebacks911 report indicates major card networks attribute up to 70% of credit card fraud to friendly fraud (chargeback misuse), with the share increasing; nearly three-quarters of merchants noted an 18% average rise over three years. This aligns with the “rising, not falling” trend but adjusts the source and precise percentage.

The term is a misnomer. There is nothing friendly about absorbing the product cost, losing the chargeback fee, and carrying the reputational damage with your acquirer.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Friendly Fraud vs. Chargeback Fraud: Core Differences

These two terms describe different threat profiles. Conflating them leads to the wrong prevention tools being applied to the wrong problem.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Friendly fraud is fought after the transaction. Chargeback fraud is blocked before it. Applying pre-auth fraud filters to friendly fraud cases generates false positives and blocks real customers.

Friendly Fraud Consequences Beyond the Lost Sale

Most merchants calculate friendly fraud losses as transaction value plus the chargeback fee. That math is incomplete.

A LexisNexis analysis of payment risk operations found that for every $1 lost to fraud, merchants incur $2.40 in additional operational costs, covering labor, technology overhead, and banking penalties.

Visa places merchants in the Visa Dispute Monitoring Program (VDMP) when monthly chargeback ratios exceed 0.9%. Mastercard triggers its monitoring program at 1.5%. Once enrolled, merchants pay program fees on top of standard chargeback costs and face potential termination of card acceptance. You can see exactly how VDMP thresholds work and what they cost in this breakdown of the Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program.

Friendly fraud also creates false positive pressure. Teams that respond by tightening fraud filters start blocking legitimate orders. That revenue loss never appears in a chargeback report.

How a Friendly Fraud Chargeback Unfolds

The sequence is straightforward and the merchant’s response window is short.

1. Customer completes a legitimate purchase.
2. Goods are delivered or digital access is granted.
3. Customer contacts their bank, not the merchant, to dispute the charge.
4. Bank debits the merchant account and opens a dispute.
5. Merchant has 20 to 45 days to submit a representment package.
6. Without documentation, the merchant loses by default.

The categories where this occurs most are digital subscriptions, travel, gaming, SaaS, and high-value apparel. These are sectors where delivery proof is either absent or easy to dismiss. For subscription businesses specifically, friendly fraud overlaps with involuntary churn in ways that compound revenue loss.

Friendly Fraud Risk by Industry

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Win rates improve significantly when evidence packages include timestamped access logs, delivery confirmation with signature, and prior customer communication records.

Prevention Methods That Produce Measurable Results

Clear billing descriptors. A large portion of friendly fraud chargebacks originate because cardholders do not recognize the charge on their statement. The descriptor shown must match the brand name the customer knows. This single change reduces “unrecognized charge” disputes without any technology investment.

Transaction evidence logging. Every order should generate a timestamped record: IP address at checkout, device fingerprint, delivery confirmation, and all customer communication. According to Google Cloud documentation on fraud detection architecture, structured event logging at the transaction level is the foundational layer for any dispute response system. Without this, representment is guesswork.

Pre-dispute alerts. Services like Ethoca and Verifi notify merchants when a cardholder contacts their bank before a chargeback is formally filed. This creates a window to resolve the issue directly and stop the dispute before it becomes a chargeback. Beast Insights covers how these networks operate in detail in this guide on chargeback alerts.

3D Secure authentication. Enrolling transactions in 3DS2 shifts liability for unauthorized transaction disputes to the issuer. For friendly fraud coded as “unauthorized,” this eliminates merchant liability on authenticated transactions. The implementation tradeoffs are covered in this overview of 3D Secure authentication.

Representment. Friendly fraud is the category most worth fighting. The evidence exists. Merchants who submit complete representment packages see win rates of 40 to 65%, depending on vertical and documentation quality. A dedicated process for this is not optional if chargeback volume is meaningful.

Friendly Fraud Prevention Tools Compared

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Using BIN data to screen transactions at the card level adds another layer of pre-authorization intelligence. This is explained further in this guide on BIN data and fraud screening.

Enterprise merchants need automated workflows because dispute volumes make manual handling cost-prohibitive. Smaller merchants benefit most from the low-cost interventions: descriptor clarity, customer communication, and 3DS2 enrollment. For merchants operating across multiple card schemes, card scheme compliance monitoring provides the oversight layer that prevents threshold breaches.

What Legitimate Disputes Look Like

Not all chargebacks are friendly fraud. Cardholders have valid grounds to dispute transactions involving stolen card use, non-delivery, or materially misrepresented products. Effective prevention means contesting false claims, not blocking the dispute mechanism for everyone.

Merchants leveraging representment software and services through a platform provider saw a net recovery rate more than 55% higher than those managing chargebacks internally, according to Chargebacks911’s 2023 Chargeback Field Report

The goal is accuracy, not aggression.

The Bottom Line

Friendly fraud is one of the most common and preventable revenue leaks in e-commerce. The businesses that manage it well aren’t doing anything exotic — they’re logging transactions carefully, communicating clearly with customers, and fighting disputes with organized evidence when they arise.

If you want a deeper look at how to build this kind of defense for your business, the team at Beast Insights has put together a comprehensive guide on friendly fraud prevention strategies that covers the full framework — from detection to dispute management.